Tuesday, September 7, 2004

#45 Wanted for Crimes of ... Drooling?

I went to the county fair (maybe two weeks ago?  I forget exactly when.)  It was kind of  a surprise.  I'm way behind in reading the newspaper again, and I'd been passing the billboard at the end of the bridge for weeks without reading it and then one day I read it, and the fair was already half over.  So I went the next day, a Thursday.  It was ending on Sunday, and I didn't want to go Friday or over the weekend because it would be so crowded.   It was crowded anyway.  Where on Earth did all those people come from?  On a Thursday!     

There was a booth on the midway where you could get a sepia toned photo taken, in costume.  The theme was "Wanted for Crimes of Passion", and you'd be posed with a pistol in one hand and a bottle of Johnny Walker Black in the other, and "NO SMILING!"  After watching a while, I decided I wanted one.  I envisioned me mean and a little sexy - sorta "Come up and see me sometime ... but ya better wear a cup".  They put an off-the-shoulder dress on me, and a big feathered hat, a feathered boa, long gloves, and the required pistol in one hand and the bottle in the other.  I wanted a cigar between my teeth, but they didn't have any.  The photographer kept saying "NO SMILING!", but I was having too much fun, and I couldn't stop smiling, so finally I had to do my relaxation thing, to shake off the giggles.  I let my head fall back, my spine slump, my arms drop, my chin and eyelids droop - and that's when he snapped the picture (of course), before I could pull all the strings to get me back together.   It's awful.  My mouth is practically drooling, my eyes look like I'm about to pass out, my body is a shapeless mound, and the gun is hanging listlessly.  I look drunk out of my gourd!     Sigh.   I really wanted a nice picture. 

----------------------------------------

I've noticed it in my entries and in other AOL journals, too - sometimes this program runs two words together.  Seems to be arbitrary.  Not at the end of a line - in the middle somewhere.  I'll store the entry, then notice the problem, edit the entry and put in a blank, and store again, and they are still schmushed together.  Sometimes if I stick two or three blanks between the words, one blank will stick, but not always.  Very strange.

-------------------------------------------

More peeves:  It annoys me when someone uses a word or phrase when they obviously have no idea what they are saying, or what it means.   Like the woman in the grocery store, commenting that it didn't matter which line she chose, "It's six-half of one, six-half of the other."   Huh?  She apparently either never heard the correct aphorism, or having heard it didn't think about it.  Or maybe she meant "they are one in the same" (huh?), as I read recently.   There was a woman on "Judge Judy" today who spoke of a man who "went to the ER room".  It wasn't nervousness - she said it five times!  She has obviously never wondered what the "R" stood for.  And the young lady rhapsodizing about a new boyfriend, "He's my dream-come-true come true."   Apparently a dream that hasn't come true yet is merely a dream-come-true.  And then there's the handcream, the makers of which claim "It absorbs fast!"  That's downright scary!  If I put it on my hand, will it eat my skin?  What does it absorb?  (Oh, you mean it is absorbed quickly?  That's entirely different.  So why not say that?)  And last (for tonight, anyway) all the people who end a list with "ect".  It's easy to remember how to spell it if   a) you know it's an abbreviation, and   b) you know it's short for "et cetera" - therefore, "etc."  (The period on the end is part of it.  That's the "-etera".)

Monday, September 6, 2004

#44 The Trailer is Gone.

I sold the utility trailer last week.  I'm having an unexpected emotional reaction.  I think it's because the sale of the Ford, the Chevy, and now finally the trailer is putting a period to the end of one of the happiest times of my life.  Like it's all behind me now, and I won't ever get it back.

I bought the Ford Taurus when Jay and I were dating, and I bought it because it would be comfortable for both me at 4'10" and Jay at 6'3".  In other words, I bought it for us.   It was the first thing that said we were seriously a couple.  The Cavalier was Jay's commuting car, for when he was driving 100 miles a day to East Fishkill.  At 40+ mpg, it was very economical.  I used to love to see him coming up the driveway in it.  He was so huge, he filled almost the whole windshield, especially when he was wearing the down coat.  The trailer was purchased when Daughter went off to college and when I knew I'd be moving in with Jay, to help transporting stuff to and from Penn State, and to here from my old home.  All three vehicles were connected with good times, a good life.

Now all I have left is the wheelchair van.  Don't get me wrong - I love it.  All that open space, the 5' vertical, the electric ramp, the low floor and kneel, the built-in tiedowns - it's very handy, and I can do and transport a lot alone that I otherwise wouldn't be able to handle at all - bicycles, lawnmowers, snowthrowers, furniture, everything just zips right up the ramp.  But it was bought at a very bad time, for a very sad reason, and now I'm keeping it to help me through the alone time.

I miss the Ford, the Chevy, and the trailer.  Their being gone makes me miss Jay even more.

#43 Flirting, Gunshot Wounds, and Other Stuff

I read something very interesting somewhere lately, can't remember where, but it stuck with me, about differences in degrees of flirting.   That if you are in a committed relationship, there's nothing wrong with looking at and appreciating beauty whenever it passes by.  And if it comes within eyelash-fluttering range, there's nothing wrong with fluttering an eyelash or two, or even engaging in a little coy conversation.  But it has to happen by chance.  When it goes over the line is when you purposely put yourself in the way of a particular other person, or when you go looking for the opportunity, or when you do it for attention, to get attention for yourself, rather than for paying attention to the other person, or especially when you imply an availability that does not exist. 

----------------------------------------------

The last building I worked in was under triple lockdown at night, so we had to have the cleaning lady in during the day, while we were still there.  The cleaning service finally had to replace her because even after several warnings, she persisted in asking us to lend her money (ah, that reminds me - another peeve - lend vs. loan).  Anyway, the last time she asked me to lend her money it was to go to North Carolina to take care of her sister's children while her sister was in the hospital.  "She's ill?"  "No, she got shot."  (Shot?! She said it so casually....) "Shot?  Drive-by?  Robbery?"  "No, she pissed off the wrong people."  She went on to say that almost everyone in her family over the age of 15 had been shot or stabbed at least once, a few fatally.  Totally blew my mind.  Very far from my culture and that of everyone else with whom I associate.  But to her, this was a normal everyday fact of life.  Sometimes you get shot.

I was reminded of her by an incident on a daytime talk show.  A woman's boyfriend was in jail, she had spent some time in jail, her son was in jail, her daughter's boyfriend was in jail, ad infinitum, and when the audience expressed disgust, she said angrily, "Look, we ain't no jail family.  Things happen.  How many of you ain't never been in jail?"  She seemed surprised and disbelieving when almost 100% of the audience raised their hands.  Again I was thinking that her life is so very far from mine - when I was brought  up short by the realization that a fair portion of my siblings have either been behind bars or were saved only by my mother's money and influence.  Oops.  Sometimes, things happen.

------------------------------------------------

There was a woman on a late night talk show - the host in fact - who said that she almost never says "I love you" to her husband.  She thought it was unnecessary to say it, "He knows how I feel", and that saying it too often dilutes it.  Today I read an advice column in which two women (both married, with children) offered their opinions. One said that people who end every phone call to their spouse or children with "I love you" are just hedging their bets - that if the other were to drop dead suddenly they could feel good that the last thing they said was "I love you".  The other woman claimed that people who say it a lot say it as a reflexive action, without feeling or meaning.  It's just a habit.

I was SHOCKED!  That's so cynical!  So cold!

I told Jay I loved him, in exactly those words ("I love you, Sweetheart" as he left the house, or "Love you, Baby Boy" in passing, or if he'd said something funny or done something cute or sweet "And you wonder why I love you?") at least five times a day, every day, maybe more.  Probably more.  Jay was the same way.  We never passed each other in the house without a big hug or a little touch.  I absolutely meant it every time.  Saying it often came naturally to Jay, and he taught me.  Friends used to say that when he and I made eye contact in public, they could see a whole silent conversation pass between us in an instant.  But really, all it was, was "I love you", practiced to perfection.

-------------------------------------------

What's with young men shaving their entire bodies?  Arms, chest, legs, back, even sometimes, ahem, "there".  It seems to be the thing to do these days.  And young women seem to expect it of them.  I've heard that teeny-boppers (Oooo did I just date myself?) prefer androgynous male singers because they find them less threatening.   Are the young men afraid to grow up?  Do the young women want their men to not look TOO male?   I can't figure it out. 

I've always preferred furry men.  I love beards.  There's a scene in "Dances with Wolves" where the native American maiden indicates to her causasian lover (in pantomime, they didn't share a language yet) that she wants him to shave his beard because it hurts her face when he kisses her.  I howled, right out loud in the theater!  No beard ever hurts your face!  Stubble hurts!  You don't ever get whisker burn from a fully grown beard!   Who the heck wrote that scene?  I can't imagine anyone getting it so wrong.  Which leads to a speculation - with these guys who shave all over, do you get full-body whisker burn? 

(My "made it up myself" joke:  "I love beards because I hate whisker burn.  ---Pause two beats---  Yeah.  It's hard to walk with whisker burn."  And then you have to turn around and walk away, so when it sinks in, you're gone.) 

After my mother's funeral, my sisters and I were at the bar in the restaurant where we all had gone for dinner, leaving the men and children downstairs.  Somehow the conversation got to man-fur, I think my younger sister was bemoaning the fact that her husband either didn't have chest hair, or did, I forget, and I mentioned that Jay had silky black hair on the back of his shoulders and his upper back, and both my sisters reared back and said "Eeeeyooouuh!"  Huh?  It's not like it crawled out of his shirt!  All his body fur was longish, straightish, very fine and soft.  He had curves around the top and inside edges of his shoulder blades, and a triangle on his lower back.  His lower arms and legs were thickly furred, with a swirled point of fur that extended out onto the top of his feet and the back of his hands.  That curving point of dark silk on the backs of his long-fingered artist's hands only emphasized their masculine sensitivity.  Without that fur they might have looked too feminine.  He had a lighter baby-down on his behind that I absolutely loved.  Petting his behind was like petting a kitten.  All of his fur grew in a direction - it wasn't random - it swirled to the right or left, or swooped down or around.  It was beautiful.  How could any real woman not delight in that?

----------------------------------------------

Pictures of all those folks in blocks-long lines outside Floridian lumber stores, waiting to buy plywood tocover their windows.  Why don't they have shutters?  Everywhere we stayed in France, there were working shutters on the windows, and every night, you'd lean out the window and pull the shutters closed.  In the morning, you'd open them.  I don't know what they were there for, it's not like they have a lot of storms.  I suppose they do foil burglars.  Jay loved them.  He loved the ceremony of them.  The closing from and opening to the world.  He wanted to put working shutters on our windows, or at least on the bedroom windows, but we'd have to replace the crank windows with double-hung, and then there's the SGDs, so it didn't happen.

Anyway, wouldn't shutters be a good idea in Florida?  I know a lot of the more expensive houses have metal shutters that roll up and down in a track.  But for the less expensive digs, permanently installed hinged wooden shutters have to be less expensive in the long run than all those sheets of plywood, they'd offer better protection, be faster and simpler to deploy, and less damaging to the window frames and exterior walls.  So why aren't they more common?  Hmmmm.  I think I smell a business opportunity.

Sunday, September 5, 2004

#42 Congratulations to the Channel 10 News Crew!

I wish I had bought a bottle of one of those fancy champagnes last night at the auction, so I could sent it to the Channel ten (WTEN, Albany or Schenectady) news writers.  The reporter was talking about a Florida woman who had been visiting this area, and has been trying to get back home for the past two weeks.  But all her flights had been cancelled or filled up because of the hurricanes, or, if she got to Florida, she wouldn't have been allowed to get to her home anyway.  He finished with (paraphrased) "Because of the third hurricane forming off the coast, her return home remains problematic."

(Cheers!  Woo woo!  Foot stomping!  They got it right!)

While I'm on the subject of newcasters and hurricanes, I pure-dee would 'preciate it if, when they talked about storm damage, they could like show us a map, sorta like the thunderstorm maps with rainfall amounts?  You, know, where they show red where there's powerful damage, orange where trailers didn't get blowed around too much, and yellow where it's just mostly tree and shingle damage?  

They give us maps of red in-danger-to-be-evacuated areas before the storm, but after, all we get is spot-pictures of the worst damage from here and there and who-knows-where.  Those of us with relatives in hurricane areas would like to know the degree of  worry we should devote.  Might cut down on the unnecessary phone calls: "Oh, no, it bypassed us by 50 miles.  Just awful muddy here...."  

#41 Penthouse Auction

I went to a local auction last night.  It was the contents of Robert (Penthouse Magazine) Guccione's Hudson River mansion.  The crowd was not the usual auction folks.  The bidding was very strange - this bunch wanted to start every bid very low, and then go very high in very small increments - which meant that every item took longer.  George-the-auctioneer at first let these 'new' bidders dictate where the bid started and allowed them to cut his increments.   Long after the "usual folks" were muttering, George finally decided to retake control.  But it still went way past midnight, a seven hour marathon.

There was one particular group of bidders who apparently came together, and who would insist on $25 increments on $7,000 items, when the bid was only at like $2,000, when George was asking for $200 increments.  We all wanted to strangle them!   I made a comment on a cigarette break that bidder number 'xyz' was driving me crazy, slowing everything down, and the guy standing next to me said "Hey!  That's us!"   I explained what my problem was, and he said that it was a business, and "why should I pay $200 more than the next lowest bidder if I can get it for only $25 more?"   Because when the increments are small, everybody keeps going, and it's STILL going to sell at the same price, or even higher because it's easier to justify a nibble than a bite - that's why!   George can judge very well how the bidding is going to go, he knows when to cut the increments and how to keep things moving, so let him do his job.   

Guccione's personal assistant was there, and "The Girlfriend", and they both smoked, so I got to talk with them during periodic addiction breaks.   I was very amused when bidder 'xyz' said that he'd paid $13,000 for the Italian walnut canopy bed because it had been used in some Penthouse photos, and the assistant said no, that bed had never been used in photos, in fact it had never even been slept in, it was another that was used, with a tapestry headboard.  I'm afraid I giggled.  

Most of the furniture and smalls didn't interest me at all.  Imagine what dark heavy gothic mixed with baroque and a lot of gilded wood would look like, and that's pretty much it.  Mostly 18th century.  A lot of Flemish and Italian.  But there were a few mid-eastern copper and bronze ewers that I liked (I did get some).  Besides, I was curious.  And auctions can be very social.  You have safe ready-made topics for conversation with strangers.  

I also ran into an ex-coworker, now the biggest realtor in the area, whom I hadn't seen in a decade at least.  He said he was friends with Guccione, had been in that mansion, (I gather he sold it to him in the first place), but he had "never seen any of this stuff!"  Back when we worked together, I practically had to beat this guy off with a stick.  But last night I gave him my number and we are going to get together for lunch some time soon.  He's now married, seemed to be happy at her side, I got no bad vibes from him, so I think lunch will be safe.  

I wore a long peach sleeveless cotton knit dress to the auction.  I'm a little self-conscious about my upper arms, so as I was going out the door, I grabbed a peach and gray tie-dye triangular silk scarf for over my shoulders.   All three edges had crocheted trim with gold beads and dangly gold coins and the three corners had longer bead and coin tassels.  The points hung to the top of my hips, and it all jingled so prettily when I moved.  I got a LOT of compliments on "my outfit", especially from the gay decorator crew.  "The Girlfriend" was the only one I told - that it's really a belly dance hip scarf.  So if we pretty soon see everyone wearing BD hip scarves as shawls - I STARTED THE FASHION!!!

#40 Patrick's Saturday Six

Never heard of the Saturday Six?  Want to play?  Click here and look for the link to the latest version in Patrick's sidebar.

1. What's your favorite thing to do while indoors?  

If I didn't ever have to do anything else, I'd do some kind of needlework all the time.  I like seeing something take shape in my hands.  Unfortunately, I rarely find the time.


2. What's your favorite thing to do while outdoors?

Walking alone in the woods or along the river.  Or driving on roads I've never been on before.

3. Do you wear any jewelry regularly?  If so, what and where?

Back when I couldn't afford nice jewelry, I developed a taste for unusual but inexpensive jewelry.  If it can't be "good", it can at least be interesting.  I bought most of my things in import or resale stores, or yard sales.  So I've got a gazillion unique-looking necklaces that always garner compliments, and I have to almost force myself to wear them to justify their staying in my closet.   


4. You have the choice of spending time alone, with a few close friends, with many friends and aquaintances, or in a large crowd consisting of people you do and don't know.  Which one would make you the most comfortable?

Alone.  Or with one dear one.  If I have to be with more than one or two, then let it be a very large group.  I tend to listen more than I talk, and the more people there are, the more interesting things I'm likely to hear.


5. How many pairs of shoes do you own?

I just counted.  Approximately 114, including bedroom slippers, and high heels from when I was working.  Some of them are 30 or more years old. My hoarding may have something to do with the fact that when I was young I didn't have more than two or three pairs of shoes at a time, and half of them were hand-me-downs from my Gramma, for Pete's Sake!   Yeah, it's on my To-Do list to sort and toss.  A lot of them hurt my feet, so they rarely get worn.  I wore one very old pair a while ago, and they literally disintegrated while I was walking through a museum.  I was asked to leave because bare feet were not allowed.


6. READER'S CHOICE QUESTION #21 from
Jeanno43 and Cherie:   If a fire or other circumstances forced you to leave your home with all of your loved ones and pets -- but only time to rescue one single item, what would you choose to take with you and why?

It's a tossup between the folder containing the receipts for all the rest of the crap, and my favorite photo of Jay. 

Saturday, September 4, 2004

#39 The English Language is Dead

I read an editorial in the local paper recently (or maybe it was a letter to the editor?  I forget.) about the lack of educating in American education.  Kids are graduating from high school with no math or writing skills, no sense of history, no reasoning abilities, and the writer complained that it is has gotten worse over the past 20 years, and seems to be snowballing. 

Based on my own experiences, I have to agree.  Not all the kids are ignorant of the most basic skills, but the proportion of those who are seems to be increasing.   It's not just the kids.  I occasionally get a newsletter from the school district, and I amuse myself by correcting all the spelling, grammar, vocabulary, and factual errors with a red pen.  I usually find at least 20 errors in a four page flyer.  Simple, basic errors, nothing fancy.  Then I stick it in an envelope and mail it back anonymously.  The  educationally handicapped are teaching the educationally deprived, so it's no wonder it's getting worse exponentially.   

My personal peeve is the misuse of words.  Andy Rooney has complained that people are misusing words, and nobody corrects them because it isn't polite to correct them (not "PC"), "besides, you know what they mean....", so that the meaning of words gets diluted, to the point where we really don't know what they mean.  And if you aren't sure how your listener is going to interpret a word, you can't use it any more.  So the misuse of words has decreased Andy's own vocabulary!  He can't use many perfectly good and very precise words any more.   

My own favorite example:   "Problematic" does not mean "is a difficulty" (in a negative sense).  It means "is a question to which we do not know the answer, but want to know" (nothing bad about it).  So if someone asks if John is coming to the party, and I answer, "John's attendance is problematic", all I'm saying is that we don't know whether John will be there or not, and I would really like to know.  But since there's a very good chance someone will run to John and tell him I don't want him to attend, I can't use a perfectly good word any more.  A word, by the way, which in 11 letters expresses what otherwise takes 11+  words.   Newscasters are the worst assassins of "problematic".  

I get very annoyed at people who say that the language is not  static, it's living, therefore meanings can change.  I'll agree we can add and delete words, but I don't agree that we can change the meaning of a word to its near opposite, to where it loses all meaning!     The word is then no longer living - it's dead!   Jay and I used to politely snarl at each other about our choice of dictionaries.  He loved his Webster's.  I despise Webster's.  The Oxford is the only real dictionary.  (Jay said the Oxford is elitist.  How is that bad?)  The problem I have with Webster's is that it documents actual lowest-common-denominator usage, which is often incorrect.  (Ok, now I understand "elitist", but I still don't see how it's bad.)   Webster's legitimizes common errors.  You will often find two contradictory definitions for the same word in Webster's.  Problematic, for example, is defined in Webster's as both an open question and a difficulty.  WRONG!  

Two days worth of reading/listening has yielded the following: 

Sight vs. site

Your vs. you're

Then vs. than

Advise vs. advice

Lose vs. loose

Formerly vs. formally  (as in "she was formally a resident of...." in an obituary)

Illiterate vs. illegitimate (believe it or not) 

Envelop vs. envelope  

Fewer vs. less

Died vs. dyed

Lie vs. lay (and tenses thereof)

Its vs. it's  (Please, teachers out there, explain that the possessive "its" is like "his" and "hers".  No apostrophe.)

Different from vs. different than ("than" is always incorrect)

Enormity has nothing to do with measuring tapes.  You can speak of "the enormity of his crime", but not about "the enormity of the elephant".

The past tense of "bid" is not "bidded".

The one that makes me howl in anguish:  Incident vs. incidence.  Especially "incidences".  (Making "incidence" plural makes my typing fingers hurt.)   I think people put "instance" and "incident" together, and that's how they get "incidences".

When Daughter was young, I insisted on correct pronunciation, on the theory that if you pronounce it correctly, you have a better chance of spelling it correctly.  I am vindicated by people who can't spell "liberry" or "athaletic".

We used to be able to improve ourselves by listening to educated people speak, and by reading, and then by paying attention to and imitating what we heard and read.   No longer.  That can be downright dangerous.  Newscasters, commercials, educators, newspaper reporters and editors - none of them want to admit that they have a responsibility to use language responsibly.  So we get sentences like "The police say that Oak Street is problematic, after several incidences of purse-snatching."    Yeah, I know what they mean, but would they know what I mean if I used the words correctly?  It would not be a problem if they didn't know.  The problem is that they would THINK they DO know.